Visualized arguments: or how to pierce the persuasive visualization and other arguments
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper will present an argument towards establishing the act of threedimensional visualisation as a valid research methodology. An argument that is supported with evidence drawn from my own practical endeavours into the problem of accessibility and the ‘persuasive visualisation’. This paper also documents the unique properties of the virtual material, focusing on its infinite malleability, in support of a secondary argument for the act of visualisation as a potential vehicle for discovery. The aforementioned evidence is drawn from a study on unrealised Utopian theatre architecture of the 1920’s and 1930’s.
منابع مشابه
Shift of “Certainty” in Pre- and Post-Citation Arguments: The Case of Textbooks in Applied Linguistics
Writing academic texts by novice researchers requires a framework and support by learning how to cite the works of others. However, compared to the studies on other academic writings, studying citations by considering certainty markers has received little attention. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the shifts of certainty markers (hedges and boosters) in pre- and post-citation ...
متن کاملGlobally Interconnecting Persuasive Arguments: The Vision of the Persuasive Web
The current Web evolves rapidly from a Web of information to a Web of Opinions. People are constantly uploading their viewpoints, ratings and comments on any conceivable topic, via blogs, social media websites, commercial websites, wikis and others. Despite some recent efforts to give a more “argumentative character” to the Web, the opinions are still expressed in purely textual form, without a...
متن کاملCompensatory Efforts; A Critique of the Pros and Cons
Compensatory efforts, positive discrimination or reverse discrimination are the terms which nowadays are used in applied ethics for a set of efforts and privileges which are scheduled for compensation of the historical oppressions and discriminations imposed upon some groups and classes in the society. The mentioned oppressions and discriminations may be applied deliberately or inadvertently or...
متن کاملHow to Handle Opposing Arguments in Persuasive Messages: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of One-Sided and Two-Sided Messages
How to Handle Opposing Arguments in Persuasive Messages: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of One-Sided and Two-Sided Messages Daniel J. O’Keefe To cite this article: Daniel J. O’Keefe (1999) How to Handle Opposing Arguments in Persuasive Messages: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of One-Sided and Two-Sided Messages, Annals of the International Communication Association, 22:1, 209-249,...
متن کاملThe Structure of Argumentation in Health Product Messages
This paper presents an analysis of argumentation in direct-to-consumer health product ads in Newsweek that brings out special features of the arguments used in the ads, including practical reasoning, chained arguments, enthymemes, and prolepsis. A way to help overcome deficiencies in techniques of tailored health communication in consumer health informatics is shown by using argumentation schem...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008